Racism lol

A look under the hood of the commies' favorite word.

I had the idea to write this because, while scrolling on Elon Musk’s app, the algorithm presented me with a video entitled “Black man PROVES Trump was NEVER a racist!” Based on the thumbnail image, the video featured some melanated sage in a red cap, breaking matters down for the MAGA honkeys, giving them permission to love Cheeto Hitler no matter what the mean old communists say.

I didn’t watch the video, because I would rather try to feed a chicken wing held between my teeth to a gangster’s pit bull, but I didn’t need to watch the video. The nerve-grating idiocy with which it was suffused was right there in the title. See, because here’s the thing: you can’t PROVE anyone is or isn’t a racist. Trump could wash all the Negro feet in Niger; Trump could record an album with 2 Live Crew; Trump could dump Melania and elope with Oprah...none of it would matter. Whatever Trump does, the shitlib hive-mind will forever hold him to be a racist. Why? Because they get to decide who’s “racist,” when, and to what degree. The word has no established parameters or quantifiable substance. It isn’t a condition, it’s a sensation. And the sensation doesn’t occur in the psyche of the “racist” party; it occurs in the mind of the imbecile using the word.

An individual can only be racist in the way that a plate of sautéed snails can be delicious. Are the snails delicious? Certainly, if you think so. Do the snails taste like a homeless dude’s underwear and cause one to begin yakking one’s stomach contents down the front of one’s shirt? Also certainly, if that happens to be the next diner’s reaction. A subjective sensation, you see, is based solely on the sensibilities of the person having, or not having, the sensation. For a party to be “racist,” another party must experience the purported “racism,” as such.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: What’s this guy talking about? “Racist” means you dislike people of other races. But, no. If that was the case, then obviously every slight against whites would set off the same international fits of fretting and pants-wetting that Trump set off by saying Mexico isn’t sending its best. But, as we all know, it’s not just acceptable, but something like required, to be “racist” against whites here in clown world. And, furthermore, to those who are “racist” against whites, their discrimination and bigotry and whatnot is not “racism.” They’re just fans of “diversity,” or “equity,” or some other corny conceptual contrivance. You call it “racism” when a black or brown or shitlib says whites should all be exterminated—but why? Well, because you’re stupid. No, I’m kidding. In actual fact, it’s because you’ve been psyop’d...trained to think, once again, that the word describes a condition, like gout, which has scientifically detectable and measurable properties. You’re imagining that some definite definition can be invoked, and that shitlibs will have to, as old Alinsky says, “live up to their own book of rules.”

But you know very well that matters never play out this way. And in thinking about it, I’ll even contradict my previous assessment. Not only does “racism” not describe any particular attitude or set of beliefs, it doesn’t describe a particular response to anyone else’s attitude or set of beliefs. It doesn’t describe anything at all. The word has no definition, it has a function...and that function is to warn white people that shitlibs are getting geared up to punish them for being white, so the whites had better STFU and do as they’re told.

Uncle Tom gets it!

Again, though, I know what you’re thinking. There must be something to this word...it makes us think of hatred, prejudice, injustice...but again, the con is exposed when we ask why—for the commie clowns who commonly cry “racism”—hatred, prejudice, and injustice directed at whites is not “racism.”

And the reason is, “racism” doesn’t actually mean these things. Even when we limit the definition to these things as they are, supposedly, perpetrated by whites against noble victims of color, the definition is still nebulous...once meaning “personal animosity,” then meaning “systemic discrimination,” and finally, today, having to do with “power dynamics” and “whiteness theory” and “microaggressions” and other such abstracted fuckery.

The definition, again, is no definition—except, we might say, a practical definition, which is: “Whatever we have to say to make whites STFU and do as they’re told.”

And with that, what we should all be able to admit at this point, is that we’re in a race war. Maybe it’s a cold race war, maybe the warfare is largely psychological thus far, but you don’t get this level of malevolence, made a foundational feature of national and international culture, accidentally. This retarded, airy, faggot word “racism” is the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The iceberg itself is why and how we find ourselves in this situation where, quite literally, simply being white is defined as a pathology.

And, no, that’s not hyperbole. It’s not even controversial. Remember critical race theory? Venture into any realm where shitlibs presume to theorize and pontificate, and what you will find is that they are obsessed—pathologically, in fact—with “whiteness,” and how to eradicate this “toxic” state of being. And, hell, you don’t have to try to decode all their retarded, airy, faggot jargon...you just have to look at what they say and do....you just have to consider the African Lancelot Du Lacs and Juliet Capulets in their media, note how they run cover for stab-happy ragheads, listen to their histrionics over Trump and his fanbase, etc.

Well, something like that.

The why of the situation requires a deeper dive than we’re capable of here, and seems to have a lot more to do with steinbergs than icebergs. The how, however, can be easily explained. Quite simply, there has been a propaganda campaign, beginning, rather circumspectly, about the time MLK started trying to interpret his dreams, to defame and demoralize pale faces. Oh, it was subtle in the MLK days...the sales pitch was, basically, “Why can’t we all get along?” But over the decades, the groundwork laid by the MLK op was built upon, the ante was steadily upped...and again, I don’t even need to make the argument regarding the campaign’s efficacy or ultimate goals, because here we are, today, with “whiteness” essentially criminalized.

Now, here I can sense you balking. Surely that is hyperbole. Whiteness isn’t, like, literally criminalized. To which I say: Really? Then try declaring, in so-called polite company, that you’re proud of being white, and would prefer to live among your own kind. Because that’s where rubber meets road, isn’t it? And, first of all, we both know that, for some strange reason, you shudder at the thought of ever saying such a thing, but secondly, we both know that such a statement, if not mitigated and equivocated, if held fast to and argued in favor of, will imperil friendships, family relationships, eventually income.

And here’s the kicker: at the very same time, we both know that black, brown, kosher and all other other-than-whites can be explicit and vociferous racial “nationalists” and “supremacists,” and encounter zero negative consequences. Hell, we both know that, here in clown world, racial advocacy by and for other-than-whites opens doors to social and financial success.

So, whatever the de jure reality might be, you know, as a matter of instinct, that it is de facto a crime to not, at least implicitly, apologize for your whiteness. Because, as just alluded to, if you have warm feelings about your whiteness, well, then, you obviously want to see your kind continue to exist...and if we pursue the logic, that requires a certain exclusive territory and whiteness-friendly culture...and now we’ve got us some “white supremacy,” and “white nationalism”—which are, of course, synonyms for “racism.”

All of which, you see, is why Trump can never not be “racist.” The reason the shitlibocracy sees the man as the embodiment of every stock villain Hollywood ever concocted is simply because, whatever the orange man actually believes—and I have grave concerns in that area—he does not, in his speech and attitudes at least, apologize for the existence of the white race.

And that, folks, is the actual litmus test for “racism.”

There you go. The power of commie brainwashing. Even the smartest black dude who ever lived got duped into using “racism” like it’s a real word.

The aforementioned propaganda campaign against whites, which got underway with the MLK circus, has a thesis statement...and the thesis statement is, as one shitlib famously put it, that whites are “the cancer of human history.” Hence the trillion movies about honkey slave-whippers, holocausters, segregationists....and radio silence regarding other-than-white historical wickedness. Hence the trillion news stories about the white dude who might have once, after three beers, said the n-word...and memory holing of the n-word who drove his fucking car through a crowd of whites. All of this, over all this time, has been a project of narrative building....the giving of the impression, to the average shit-for-brains, by means of brazen lies and lies of omission, that whites are eternally victimizing the world.

But, then, having said that, allow me to contradict myself again. “Racist” has a definite definition. What it is, when used as its architects intended, is the crime of a white person contradicting the “cancer of human history” thesis. Again, I don’t even need to make this argument. That’s the only time you see the word having any real sting—that is, having a credible threat of some form of cancellation attached. And you already know—because shitlibs can no longer be bothered to hide it—that the “cancer of human history” thesis is what underlies the whole shitlib shitshow.   

These words, you see—“racist,” “supremacist,” and pretty much any other linguistic fear-and-loathing trigger that you know, if you’re branded with it, will result in cancellation...or in a British context, will result in jail time or fifty lashings with a machete—these words, I’m saying, are not anything that you, as a sane and honest person, can make use of. They belong to the commies, and the commies get to define them. When you try to PROVE that Trump isn’t “racist,” you’re just affirming that “racist” is a real, measurable, testable condition....and when you do that, as I hope I’ve made clear, you affirm the shitlib thesis.

I get it, though. What you mean to say is that Trump doesn’t bear any animosity toward other-than-whites. And, well, that’s all fine and good, but, finally, who gives a fuck? We’re here in Western civilization. Whites built the place, and if you look around, it’s kinda obvious at this late date that only we can maintain it. If Trump intends to MAGA, he only needs one item on his agenda, and that’s demographics. But, then, forget I said that, and forget that you’re fully aware of how true it is. You know what people might call us.